Skip to content
CoreMark provides standardized benchmarks to measure proces…

The Lowest-Rated Titles of 2025, Based on Aggregate Scores

At every turn, gamers are foaming at the mouth to post their selections of the top titles of 2025. But what about the disasters, the underperformers? Let's take a few moments to honor the absolute worst games of the year, as determined by review aggregator Metacritic. Could each of these games as bad as the ratings suggest? Let's find out.

10. Nintendo Switch 2 Welcome Tour

Aggregate Score: 54/100, User Score: 3.4/10

The early response to this tech demo were heavily influenced by its $9.99 price tag, with many feeling cheesed off it wasn't a free pack-in like some other console launches. Reviewer sentiment varied dramatically, from "crushing disappointment" to somewhat forgiving appraisals that praised the delightful software underneath the controversy. In spite of the grumbling, the title proved to be a surprisingly robust digital seller during its launch month.

9. Rennsport

Metascore: 53/100, Audience Score: 3.2/10

Billed as "beyond a racing game," this driving sim from studios in Germany and Poland garnered largely negative reviews. The consensus was that the game fell short in key areas, especially in a year packed with high-quality racing titles. In the eyes of critics, this disappointing sim was best left on the shelf.

8. Bubsy in: The Purrfect Collection

Metascore: 53/100, Audience Score: 8.6/10

Before we start: the irritating colon usage is a minor annoyance. This collection of SNES and PS1 mascot platformers showcases a sarcastic feline known for incessant hacky one-liners. The consensus was that these games were not good in their time and haven't gotten better with age. The surprisingly strong user score is a curious contrast to the professional reviews.

7. Nen x Impact

Aggregate Score: 53, User Score: 3.5

This manga-based fighter was met with harsh criticism from both reviewers and the dedicated community. Issues included a limited character selection and a severe lack of gameplay modes. Fan reaction was particularly vitriolic, with some voicing a hope that the title's failure would serve as a lesson for similar releases.

6. Riders Vs Dogoos

Aggregate Score: 51, Audience Score: 5.3

Hailing from the niche Hyperdimension Neptunia series, this vehicle combat game tasks players with collecting Dogoos. Reviewers felt that its attempt to recreate a *Katamari Damacy*-like gameplay loop was unsuccessful, coming across as more of a cash grab than a substantial Neptunia game. Its 3-hour duration combined with a $40 price tag raised eyebrows.

5. Captain Blood

Aggregate Score: 50, User Score: 5.3

This title is a resurrected relic from the Xbox era, seeing the light of day after a very long time in development hell. The team behind it opted to keep the game as an original product of its time, accepting that contemporary players might criticize its old-school mechanics. As such, many reviews concluded that the interesting history of its journey was far richer than the actual gameplay.

4. Scar-Lead

Aggregate Score: 44, Audience Score: 2.4

This anime-art third-person shooter modeled after games like *Returnal* disappointed with critics. Frequent criticisms centered on repetitive adversaries, repetitive levels, and a unengaging plot. A much-criticized system involving the protagonist's clothing was widely panned and took away from the game's enjoyment.

3. Paramedic Simulator

Aggregate Score: 44, User Score: 4.9

Think of the tense medical sims of the past, then take out the satisfying gameplay. That, according to reviews, is essentially *Ambulance Life*. Players found the ambulance-driving sequences to be tedious and repetitive, and the narrative's handling of serious themes was criticized as being poorly executed. The overall experience was deemed a missed opportunity.

2. Tamagotchi Plaza

Metascore: 43, Audience Score: 5.8

This shift away from the classic digital companion formula turns the franchise into a minigame collection title. The result, according to critics, was a unsatisfying collection of simple minigames that rapidly became boring. Some reviews went so far as to label it one of the worst titles available on its platform, noting a dearth of depth.

1. MindsEye

Aggregate Score: 37, Audience Score: 2.5

Intended to be a blockbuster open-world action game from a team featuring industry veterans, *MindsEye* was a notable critical flop. Reviews universally panned its weak action, uninspired storytelling, and a plethora of horrendous bugs. Several found it to be a downgrade compared to much older games in the similar style. Amidst the sea of negativity, a few of positive user reviews found something to enjoy in the experience, providing a rare contrast.

Written by

Joann Kim

Embedded systems engineer with over a decade of experience in performance optimization and hardware benchmarking.

CoreMark

Type to search articles.